by Playgeneration » Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:29 pm
I think its a bit of a confusing mess really. The original Wii did well as it was a simple idea, anyone could pick up the remote and play Wii Sports and understand it right away. This machine not only has the new massive screen controller with its ton of buttons (totally the opposite to the simple remote) but also a traditional controller, and then the old remotes too. So if a game can support play with the normal controller and remotes, then it can't actually make any proper use of the screen controller. They also promote the idea that you can play the game just on the controller while people are watching other things on the TV, which then cancels out any use of two screens in a game. So if the screen controller isn't going to be needed by a game, because it has to support single screen play or the other controllers, whats the point?
I expect it will do well enough by selling to kids and the people who fall over themselves to buy every version of Zelda and Mario Kart etc. But I think they will struggle to get the pensioners, mums and other demographics the Wii captured this time. As for typical male gamers, a lot depends on what Sony and Microsoft do, but plenty of people bought into the Wii, only to see it not live up to the hype or expectations, and won't rush into buying its successor.
If Nintendo can come up with a decent new game franchise or two, rather than the same old sequels all the time, then the shortcomings of the console can be over looked.